Care coordination is a cornerstone of effective healthcare, particularly for individuals with complex needs. For those navigating intricate health challenges, a well-orchestrated care plan can dramatically improve outcomes and quality of life. At the heart of this coordinated approach lies the Care Coordination Strengths And Needs Assessment Tool. This vital instrument empowers healthcare providers, families, and individuals themselves to collaboratively identify strengths, pinpoint needs, and build a roadmap for comprehensive and patient-centered care.
Understanding the intricacies of care coordination begins with recognizing the diverse landscape of individuals who benefit from it. While often associated with children with special health care needs (CSHCN), the principles and tools of care coordination are applicable across various populations and age groups. CSHCN, as defined by McPherson et al. (1998) [1], are children who have or are at increased risk for chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional conditions and who also require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally. This definition underscores the necessity for tailored and coordinated support systems.
The emergence of pediatric complex care as a distinct field highlights the growing recognition of children with medical complexity (CMC) [2, 3]. These children often require specialized medical interventions, frequent hospitalizations, and ongoing support from multiple specialists. Data from the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) [4] reveals the significant number of families navigating these complexities, emphasizing the critical role of care coordination in mitigating fragmented care and optimizing resource utilization. Studies have consistently shown that care coordination can lead to reduced hospital utilization and healthcare costs for CMC [5, 7].
The Pivotal Role of Strengths and Needs Assessment in Care Coordination
Effective care coordination is not simply about scheduling appointments or connecting individuals with services. It’s a dynamic process that necessitates a deep understanding of the individual’s unique circumstances, capabilities, and challenges. This is where the strengths and needs assessment tool becomes indispensable.
As JP’s literature review [6] indicates, care coordination outcomes are intrinsically linked to the quality and comprehensiveness of the assessment process. A robust assessment goes beyond merely listing deficits; it actively seeks to identify individual and family strengths that can be leveraged to achieve care goals. McAllister et al. [8] emphasize practice-based care coordination as a medical home essential, further solidifying the integration of assessment within routine care delivery.
Identifying Strengths: Building from a Foundation of Resilience
A strengths-based approach is fundamental to effective care coordination. By focusing on what individuals and families can do, rather than solely on their limitations, care teams can foster resilience, empowerment, and self-efficacy. Strengths assessments may uncover:
- Individual skills and talents: Communication abilities, problem-solving skills, self-advocacy, and personal interests.
- Family resources and support systems: Strong family relationships, extended family support, community connections, and access to financial resources.
- Existing coping mechanisms: Effective strategies for managing stress, navigating challenges, and maintaining well-being.
Recognizing and building upon these strengths allows for the development of care plans that are not only realistic and achievable but also inherently motivating and empowering for the individual and their family.
Pinpointing Needs: Addressing Challenges and Barriers to Well-being
Complementary to strength identification is the critical process of needs assessment. This involves systematically identifying and prioritizing the individual’s unmet needs across various domains of life. These needs may encompass:
- Medical and health-related needs: Access to specialists, medication management, therapy services, durable medical equipment, and home healthcare.
- Social and emotional needs: Mental health support, social skills development, peer interaction opportunities, and emotional regulation strategies.
- Educational and vocational needs: Specialized education services, vocational training, and support for transitioning into employment.
- Practical and logistical needs: Transportation assistance, housing support, financial aid, and respite care for caregivers.
A comprehensive needs assessment utilizes various methods, including interviews, questionnaires, and observations, to gather information from multiple perspectives – the individual, family members, caregivers, and relevant professionals.
The Care Coordination Strengths and Needs Assessment Tool: A Practical Instrument
The care coordination strengths and needs assessment tool is not a monolithic entity but rather a category of instruments designed to structure and standardize the assessment process. These tools can vary in format and scope but share the common goal of facilitating a thorough and balanced evaluation.
As highlighted in the Massachusetts Child Health Quality Coalition’s recommendations [26], a structured tool ensures that assessments are comprehensive, consistent, and aligned with best practices. These tools often incorporate:
- Standardized questionnaires and checklists: Covering various domains of functioning and well-being.
- Guided interview protocols: To elicit detailed information in a structured yet person-centered manner.
- Rating scales and scoring systems: To quantify the level of need and track progress over time.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [16, 27] emphasizes the importance of standardized measures in care coordination, and strengths and needs assessment tools are a key component of such standardized approaches.
Benefits of Utilizing a Strengths and Needs Assessment Tool
The adoption of a care coordination strengths and needs assessment tool offers numerous advantages for individuals, families, and healthcare systems:
- Enhanced Person-Centered Care: Tools facilitate a deeper understanding of the individual’s unique perspective, values, and preferences, ensuring care plans are truly tailored to their needs and goals [15, 44].
- Improved Communication and Collaboration: A structured assessment process fosters clearer communication among all members of the care team, including the individual and family, leading to more effective collaboration and shared decision-making [40, 42, 82].
- Efficient Resource Allocation: By systematically identifying and prioritizing needs, tools help ensure that resources are allocated effectively and efficiently to address the most pressing concerns [30, 31].
- Proactive and Preventative Care: Needs assessments can identify potential problems early on, allowing for proactive interventions and preventative strategies to mitigate risks and promote well-being.
- Outcome Measurement and Quality Improvement: Standardized tools provide a framework for measuring outcomes and tracking progress over time, enabling continuous quality improvement efforts in care coordination programs [39, 45].
Implementing a Strengths and Needs Assessment Tool: Best Practices
Successful implementation of a care coordination strengths and needs assessment tool requires careful planning and attention to key factors:
- Tool Selection: Choosing a tool that is appropriate for the target population, setting, and purpose is crucial. Factors to consider include the tool’s validity, reliability, cultural sensitivity, and ease of use.
- Training and Education: Care coordinators and other professionals involved in the assessment process need adequate training on how to administer, score, and interpret the tool effectively.
- Integration into Workflow: The tool should be seamlessly integrated into existing workflows and care processes to minimize burden and maximize efficiency.
- Family and Individual Engagement: The assessment process should be actively engaging and empowering for individuals and families, ensuring their voices are heard and valued [79].
- Ongoing Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation of tool implementation are essential to identify areas for improvement and ensure the tool is achieving its intended purpose.
Conclusion: Empowering Care Coordination Through Effective Assessment
The care coordination strengths and needs assessment tool is more than just a checklist or questionnaire; it’s a powerful enabler of person-centered, effective, and efficient care. By systematically identifying strengths and pinpointing needs, these tools lay the foundation for collaborative care planning, improved communication, and ultimately, better outcomes for individuals navigating complex health journeys. As healthcare continues to evolve towards more integrated and patient-centric models, the strategic use of strengths and needs assessment tools will remain a critical component of high-quality care coordination.
References
[1] McPherson M, Arango P, Fox H, et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998;102(1 Pt 1):137-140.
[2] Cohen E, Berry JG, Sanders L, Schor EL, Wise PH. Status Complexicus? The Emergence of Pediatric Complex Care. Pediatrics. 2018;141(Supplement 3):S202-S211.
[3] Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R, et al. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):529-538.
[4] Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. 2017 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) data query. Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health supported by Cooperative Agreement U59MC27866 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau (HRSA MCHB). Retrieved from https://www.childhealthdata.org/browse/survey/results?q=6546&r=1.
[5] Cohen E, Berry JG, Camacho X, Anderson G, Wodchis W, Guttmann A. Patterns and costs of health care use of children with medical complexity. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):e1463-1470.
[6] J P. A Review of the Literature for Outcomes Associated with Aspects of Care Coordination and the Presence of a Care Coordinator for Children with Complex Needs. Center of Excellence on Quality of Care Measures for Children with Complex Needs. 2012.
[7] Peter S, Chaney G, Zappia T, Van Veldhuisen C, Pereira S, Santamaria N. Care coordination for children with complex care needs significantly reduces hospital utilization. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2011;16(4):305-312.
[8] McAllister JW, Presler E, Cooley WC. Practice-based care coordination: a medical home essential. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e723-733.
[9] Peter S et al., Care coordination for children with complex care needs.
[10] Farmer JE, Clark MJ, Drewel EH, Swenson TM, Ge B. Consultative care coordination through the medical home for CSHCN: a randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(7):1110-1118.
[11] Peter S et al., Care coordination for children with complex care needs.
[12] Farmer JE, Clark MJ, Sherman A, Marien WE, Selva TJ. Comprehensive primary care for children with special health care needs in rural areas. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):649-656.
[13] Stewart K, Bradley K et al. Care Coordination for Children with Special Health Care Needs in Medicaid: Lessons from Medicare. Am. Journal of Managed Care; 24(4); April 2018.
[14] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[15] Council on Children With Disabilities and Medical Home Implementation Project Advisory Committee. Patient- and family-centered care coordination: a framework for integrating care for children and youth across multiple systems. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5).
[16] “Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update”, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, June 2014, https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/coordination/atlas2014/chapter2.html.
[17] Bachman S, Comeau M, Jankovosky K. The Care Coordination Conundrum and Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Boston, MA: The Catalyst Center; 2015.
[18] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4. Care Management and Support, Competency A.
[19] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4. Standard CM-01.
[20] Silow-Carroll S, Rodin D, Pham A. Interagency, Cross-Sector Collaboration to Improve Care for Vulnerable Children: Lessons from Six State Initiatives. Albany, NY: Health Management Associates; 2018.
[21] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[22] Bachman S, Comeau M, Jankovosky K. The Care Coordination Conundrum and Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Boston, MA: The Catalyst Center; 2015.
[23] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[24] Barth S et al., Care Coordination in Integrated Care Programs Serving Dually Eligible Beneficiaries – Health Plan Standards, Challenges and Evolving Approaches. Health Management Associates: March 2019.
[25] Kuo D et al., Care Coordination for Children With Medical Complexity: Whose Care Is It, Anyway?. Pediatrics: March 2018.
[26] Massachusetts Child Health Quality Coalition. Care Coordination Strengths and Needs Assessment: Recommendations for a Structured Tool. February 2015. http://www.masschildhealthquality.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1.-CHQC-CC-Needs-Assessment-Tool-Recommendations-HIGH-LEVEL.pdf
[27] Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update. Content last reviewed June 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/coordination/atlas2014/index.html
[28] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4. Standard KM-02.
[29] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017. Standards CM-2 Element D, LTSS-1 Element F, LTSS-1 Element G.
[30] Stille C et al., Aligning Services with Needs: Characterizing the Pyramid of Complexity Tiering for Children with Chronic and Complex Conditions. 2018. Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Health.
[31] Stille C et al., Aligning Services with Needs: Characterizing the Pyramid of Complexity Tiering for Children with Chronic and Complex Conditions. 2018. Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Health.
[32] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4. Standard CM-02, Element C.
[33] Stille C et al., Aligning Services with Needs: Characterizing the Pyramid of Complexity Tiering for Children with Chronic and Complex Conditions. 2018. Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Health.
[34] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4. Standard CM-02, Element C.
[35] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Population Health Program Accreditation 2019. Standard PHP 4, Element A.
[36] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[37] Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update. Content last reviewed June 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
[38] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Population Health Program Accreditation 2019. Population Segmentation, element A.
[39] National Quality Forum (NQF), Preferred Practices and Performance Measures for Measuring and Reporting Care Coordination: A Consensus Report, Washington, DC: NQF; 2010.
[40] McAllister, J. (2014 ). Achieving a Shared Plan of Care with Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs: A White Paper and Implementation Guide, Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Healthcare.
[41] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017
[42] McAllister, J. (2014 ). Achieving a Shared Plan of Care with Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs: A White Paper and Implementation Guide, Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Healthcare.
[43] Ibid.
[44] American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Children with Disabilities and Medical Home Implementation Project Advisory Committee. Patient- and Family-Centered Care Coordination: A Framework for Integrating Care for Children and Youth Across Multiple Systems. Pediatrics May 2014, 133 (5) e1451-e1460. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/5/e1451.full
[45] National Quality Forum (NQF), Preferred Practices and Performance Measures for Measuring and Reporting Care Coordination: A Consensus Report, Washington, DC: NQF; 2010.
[46] McAllister, J. (2014 ). Achieving a Shared Plan of Care with Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs: A White Paper and Implementation Guide, Lucille Packard Foundation for Children’s Healthcare.
[47] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017.
[48] Patience H. White, W. Carl Cooley. Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American College of Physicians. Supporting the Health Care Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood in the Medical Home Pediatrics November 2018, 142 (5) e20182587. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/5/e20182587.
[49] Berry JG, Goldmann DA, Mandl KD, et al. Health information management and perceptions of the quality of care for children with tracheotomy: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:117
[50] Ziniel SI, Rosenberg HN, Bach AM, Singer SJ, Antonelli RC. Validation of a Parent-Reported Experience: Measure of Integrated Care. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20160676
[51] AHRQ Care Coordination Measures Atlas, Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[52] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[53] “Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home,” American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, and American Osteopathic Association, March 2007, https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/practice_management/pcmh/initiatives/PCMHJoint.pdf
[54] Antonelli, RC, Huth, Rosenberg, H, Bach, A, Eds. Pediatric Care Coordination Curriculum: An Interprofessional Resource to Effectively Engage Patients and Families in Achieving Optimal Child Health Outcomes, 2nd Edition. Boston Children’s Hospital. 2019. https://medicalhomeinfo.aap.org/tools-resources/Documents/PCCC%202nd%20Edition/Full%20Pediatric%20Care%20Coordination%20Curriculum.pdf
[55] Thorpe JH, Hayes K. Selected Provisions from Integrated Care RFPs and Contracts: Care Coordination. Integrated Care Resource Center. 2013. http://www.chcs.org/media/ICRC_Care_Coordination_FINAL_7_29_13.pdf
[56] Boston Children’s Hospital. Care coordination curriculum. 2013. Available at: www.childrenshospital.org/care-coordination-curriculum.
[57] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017.
[58] Thorpe JH, Hayes K. Selected Provisions from Integrated Care RFPs and Contracts: Care Coordination. Integrated Care Resource Center. 2013. http://www.chcs.org/media/ICRC_Care_Coordination_FINAL_7_29_13.pdf
[59] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017
[60] Ziniel SI, Rosenberg HN, Bach AM, Singer SJ, Antonelli RC. Validation of a Parent-Reported Experience: Measure of Integrated Care. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20160676
[61] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Case Management Accreditation 2017
[62] Sara S. Bachman, Meg Comeau, and Katharyn M. Jankov, “The Care Coordination Conundrum and Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs,” The Catalyst Center, November 2015, http://cahpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Care-Coordination-Conundrum.pdf
[63] Got Transition, Center for Health Care Transition Improvement. Six Core Elements of Health Care Transition 2.0. Available at: http://www.gottransition.org/resourceGet.cfm?id=206.
[64] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4.
[65] American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Family Physicians, and American College of Physicians. Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group. Supporting the health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home. Pediatrics. 2011; 128-182.
[66] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
[67] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4.
[68] White, Patience H, and Carl Cooley. “White PH, Cooley WC; Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Family Physicians; American College of Physicians. Supporting the Health Care Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood in the Medical Home. Pediatrics. 2018;142(5):e20182587.” Pediatrics 143, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3610.
[69] Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update. Content last reviewed June 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic care/improve/coordination/atlas2014/index.html
[70] National Committee for Quality Assurance. Standards and Guidelines for NCQA’s Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2017, Version 4.
[71] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Implementation Quick Start Guide Warm Handoff: The Guide to Improving Patient Safety in Primary Care Settings by Engaging Patients and Families. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-family-engagement/pfeprimarycare/warm-handoff-qsg-brochure.pdf
[72] Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2009
[73] Council on Children With Disabilities and Medical Home Implementation Project Advisory Committee. Patient- and family-centered care coordination: a framework for integrating care for children and youth across multiple systems. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5).
[74] “Care Coordination Measures Atlas Update”, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, June 2014, https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/improve/coordination/atlas2014/chapter2.html.
[75] “Managing the Practice: Patient Care Coordinator.” American Academy of Pediatrics, n.d. https://www.aap.org/en-us/professional-resources/practice-transformation/managing-practice/Pages/Patient-Care-Coordinator.aspx.
[76] “What Is an Electronic Health Record (EHR)?” Health IT.gov, September 10, 2019. https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr.
[77] “Children with Special Health Care Needs.” HRSA Maternal and Child Health. Health Resources and Services Administration, August 2019. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-child-health-topics/children-and-youth-special-health-needs.
[78] The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, Title V. https://www.congress.gov/111/plaws/publ148/PLAW-111publ148.pdf
[79] Rittenbach, Katherine, Candice G. Horne, Terence O’Riordan, Allison Bichel, Nicholas Mitchell, Adriana M. Fernandez Parra, and Frank P. Macmaster. “Engaging People with Lived Experience in the Grant Review Process.” BMC Medical Ethics 20, no. 1 (December 16, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0436-0.
[80] “What Is Medical Home?” Engaging Patients and Families. American Academy of Pediatrics, n.d. https://www.aap.org/en-us/professional-resources/practice-transformation/managing-patients/Pages/what-is-medical-home.aspx.
[81] “Types of Health Care Quality Measures.” Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, July 2015. https://www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/measures/types.html.
[82]McAllister, Jeanne W. “Achieving a Shared Plan of Care with Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs: An Implementation Guide.” Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health, May 2014. https://www.lpfch.org/sites/default/files/field/publications/achieving_a_shared_plan_of_care_implementation.pdf.
[83] “What Is Trauma-Informed Care?” The Institute on Trauma and Trauma-Informed Care (ITTIC). University of Buffalo Center for Social Research, n.d. http://socialwork.buffalo.edu/social-research/institutes-centers/institute-on-trauma-and-trauma-informed-care/what-is-trauma-informed-care.html.
